Coalition bucks wisdom and blames less fortunate

The current Coalition government wants to plan for a sustainable financial future. Sure welfare is part of the mix to consider change and especially the well fare that goes to the well off and the very, very well off, not the less fortunate. The middle class welfare and high end welfare is not sustainable.

The reality is that the current government has not geared the economy to provide sufficient jobs, and demoralising the unemployed will only push them to being beggars not employed. Many unemployed cannot find work because they are 50 or over and subsist on newstart after a life of hard work and a great desire to be in the workforce.

The Coalition needs to seek counsel from Plato. In Plato’s Republic the ideal city is founded on wisdom, courage, moderation and justice.These are not the elements guiding the current Australian government. This Coalition government is again in the spot light for taking from the poor and giving to the rich. This government’s seeks to introduce a limosine parental payment scheme, subsides high income superannuation, removes the mining tax, while it removes the low income superannuation subsidy and is now on target to undermine those with disabilities and punish the unemployed where government has not managed the economy to create training and jobs.

Mr Shorten said if the government wanted to save money, it should scrap its “gold-plated’ paid-parental leave scheme and look at superannuation rules that favoured high income earners.”

This is also happening while TAFE colleges are having funding removed so limits training and job ready programs for these unemployed.

Many long-term unemployed would prefer to be working full-time hours. In July 2010, three-quarters (75%) of long-term unemployed men and half (50%) of long-term unemployed women stated they would have preferred to have been working full-time hours (35 hours or more per week).

Eva Cox wrote “Other hidden unemployed older workers are not on any benefits because they have a working spouse and are therefore ineligible. While not in such dire financial need, they are often suffering from loss of self-esteem from futile job hunting efforts and may also have health problems because they feel excluded and rejected. The social costs of unemployment do not get the same level of attention as the economic costs, despite plenty of evidence of the damage.”

The main flaw in the government’s approach to unemployment is that it sees the problem as being the unemployed person rather than employers’ prejudices.

The unemployed do not want to be unemployed generally. They haven’t had the support and advantages available to most people. Enable and encourage them, direct and facilitate, but don’t demoralise and punish, which is the direction that this Coalition is on a mission to pull off.

 


References

http://faculty.cua.edu/hoffmann/courses/201_1068/Plato-5%20Republic.4.pdf

http://www.abc.net.au/news/2013-11-02/older-people-struggle-to-reenter-workforce/5065854

http://www.crikey.com.au/2012/04/19/senior-job-seekers-in-australia/?wpmp_switcher=mobile

http://www.abs.gov.au/AUSSTATS/abs@.nsf/Lookup/4102.0Main+Features20Sep+2011#2

http://www.abs.gov.au/AUSSTATS/abs@.nsf/Lookup/4102.0Main+Features20Sep+2011#5

http://www.theaustralian.com.au/national-affairs/age-pension-quarantined-from-welfare-review-kevin-andrews/story-fn59niix-1226806633530

http://www.smartcompany.com.au/growth/economy/35246-world-s-richest-85-people-are-as-wealthy-as-half-the-world-s-population-combined-the-gap-grows-in-australia.html?utm_source=SmartCompany&utm_campaign=b7fad1a81a-Tuesday_21_January_201421_01_2014&utm_medium=email&utm_term=0_234118efee-b7fad1a81a-93943241

 

 

Enhanced by Zemanta

The affront of change

Change, like technology, is not in itself good or bad rather, change is often a tool used to gain advantage over others, which again is not necessarily good or bad in itself, but the degree of advantage and exploitation over the more vulnerable is the issue and concern. Therefore, it is in how change is managed, it is the trust given and used by the less Continue reading

Iceland is an example to the world

“After the crash, many Icelanders turned away from the world and global trade. They began spending more time with their families and children, in the outdoors and with Icelandic books. Alcohol consumption dropped among young Icelanders, and the subjective feeling of happiness increased.” Spiegel Online

It seems that I am not the only one taking note of Iceland’s financial and wellbeing recovery. A few days after I wrote on Iceland Spiegel have also put pen to paper on Iceland.

Continue reading

Iceland let its banks collapse in the GFC

Iceland is gutsy. Unlike every other economy that I am aware of it let its banks take the rap for their own mistakes in the GFC of 2008.

The Icelandic Prime Minister at the time said :

“…dozens of banks around the world have had to throw in the towel and look to the state for assistance in their home countries. The problem which faced the Icelandic Government when this chain of events was unleashed was more serious than the problem facing other governments, because of how large the Icelandic banking system was in proportion to the economy. It was, therefore, clear that it was neither sensible nor feasible for the Icelandic state to shoulder the burdens of the entire banking system.”

Continue reading

Germany is leading the way with family friendly corporate values

As the strongest country of the European it is great to see Germany leading the way in adopting attitudes and work practices that recognise employess are people, and these persons have family, family responsibilities. While many family friendly policies have most often meant flexibility for women in the workforce, Germany in particular is adjusting corporate culture to assist men in their family responsibilities in their role as fathers.

Continue reading

Is it really prosperity if it is not shared

“I think all of us here today would acknowledge that we’ve lost that sense of shared prosperity.” Barack Obama, 27 March 2008

Any prosperity is not an expanding and inclusive concept is not really prosperity but greed and self indulgence of the worst kind.

This is informed by the way I see love. Love is an expanding concept, the more you are loved the more you have to offer to those around you. As soon as love becomes an end in itself it is more about selfishness, greed and is mean-spirited, and not love at all.

Continue reading

The poor are undeserving

This is the rationale of those who want to protect their own imagined sense of merit. There exist among the more fortunate members of the world that they have achieved their good fortune by their own worthiness, and they believe this despite the harsh reality that they are so thoroughly self-seeking and self-satisfied and do not have the common good anywhere in their scheme.

Continue reading

Prosperity needs a lot more innovative thought than Hockey could imagine

Ross Gittins wrote, “What made the recurrence of my fiscal nightmare so scary was Hockey’s fatuous statement that ”no country has ever taxed its way to prosperity”, which signalled his resolve to get the deficit down purely by cuts in government spending. Seriously? That’s a sign he still doesn’t understand the nature and severity of his problem. No treasurer has ever purely cut his way to budget balance. Not an encouraging sign.”

We need to look to generating prosperity in ways that are positive and create momentum for the creation of the society of the future. Impoverishing the vulnerable within a

Continue reading

Feminism benefits men

Respect and valuing both genders can only benefit both men and women equally. Males who have not been exposed to men who value and respect women, in the family and in the community, struggle to learn those behaviours that enable them to have positive enjoyable and meaningful relationships with women. Role modeling and communication skills are learned by witnessing those behaviours and interactions within cultures and society. Women equally learn behaviours and access esteem and positive relations with Continue reading

LNP: GIve to the rich, take from the poor

The Coalition want to scrap supporting superannuation for low income earners while bolstering the superannuation of high income earners. Yes. More of the same from the Coalition with Abbott and Hockey. The family values here are that you are only ever eligible, now and in the future, if you already have everything you need and everything you want. Otherwise it is not our problem according to the policy of the Coalition.

This direction of policy tells me there is no no consideration of just or fair. This direction tells me we are dealing with a medieval mindset to enslave the less fortunate now and well Continue reading